Consumer-Directed Care
HSA
'Landmines' Could Cause Problems for Insurers, Employers
Reprinted
from the Feb. 4, 2005, issue of INSIDE
CONSUMER-DIRECTED CARE, a biweekly newsletter with timely news
and insightful analysis of benefit design, contracts, market strategies and
financial results.
It's
been six months since the Treasury Dept. issued its last significant round of
guidance on HSAs, but questions — and loose interpretations of the rules —
continue to baffle insurers, employers and consumers.
The
HSA provision of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
Act of 2003 allows anyone with a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) - at least
$1,000 for single coverage and $2,000 for couples and families - to open an HSA
to pay for medical expenses.
During
a Jan. 27 audioconference sponsored by ICDC, two industry experts took on
several common HSA "landmines" including prescription drug coverage,
prohibited transactions and HSA contribution rules for employers.
One
of the most perplexing questions for employers is whether HSAs are subject to
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), said John Hickman,
a benefits attorney in the Atlanta office of Alston & Bird. If subject to
ERISA, HSAs would have to comply with portability and privacy rules under the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), which would
add another layer of complexity to an already confusing list of rules and
regulations. "Many employers don't appreciate the scope of the Dept. of
Labor's exemption for HSAs from ERISA," Hickman said. "But you can get
into sticky situations if ERISA applies to your HSA arrangement," he
warned.
The
good news: HSAs are little more than self-administered, self-adjudicated savings
accounts that are not considered employee welfare benefit plans even when
employers contribute to the accounts, Hickman explained. That means they're not
subject to ERISA if they meet basic "safe harbor" requirements.
The
bad news: Employers could trigger ERISA if they don't satisfy several
conditions. First, participation in an HSA must be voluntary, and restrictions
cannot be placed on an account holder's ability to transfer HSA dollars to
another HSA trustee. The employer cannot restrict the account distributions
(e.g., to medical expenses only), cannot endorse an HSA trustee and cannot
influence HSA investment decisions made by account holders.
To
avoid such compliance issues, Hickman suggested that employers make it clear to
employees that the HSA is not health coverage and is not an employer-sponsored
benefit plan. "Draw a clear line between the HSA and the health coverage to
make it clear that there are two components," he advised.
Employers,
such as banks, that can serve as an HSA custodian might have to take additional
steps to avoid ERISA traps. An employer that serves as an HSA custodian, for
example, should not make the terms of the HSA more attractive to its own
employees than to people outside the company, Hickman said.
Five
Common HSA Landmines
Here's
a look at what Hickman and Ronald Bachman, a consultant in the
Atlanta
office of PricewaterhouseCoopers, identified as some of the biggest trouble
spots related to HSAs:
 | Spouse's health coverage: Family health coverage, according to the Treasury Dept., is
anything other than single coverage. Due to a "glitch" in the
statute, someone enrolled in an HDHP with single coverage could be
disqualified from opening an HSA if his or her spouse is enrolled in a non-HDHP
(such as an HMO) that provides family coverage (e.g., employee + child).
Under a broad interpretation of the family coverage rule, "neither
spouse can have an HSA even if the [HDHP] enrollee is not covered under the
spouse's family coverage," Hickman explained. "We are hoping that
issue is resolved so that that person is not disqualified when not covered
under the spouse's plan." Editor's note: During a Feb. 1 conference in
Atlanta, Roy Ramthun, senior advisor on health initiatives at the Treasury
Dept., said that a spouse's coverage would not adversely impact an
employee's HSA eligibility if the employee is not a covered dependent under
the spouse's plan..
|
 | Spouse's flexible spending account (FSA): A
similar problem pops up when a spouse is enrolled in a general-purpose FSA.
While an individual might have single HDHP coverage, she is not eligible to
contribute to an HSA if her husband has an FSA that can cover expenses
incurred by all family members. Although the creation of "single"
and "family" FSAs would solve the problem, it could lead to
"administrative difficulties" for plan administrators, Hickman
noted.
|
 | Pharmacy discount cards: Individuals who have health coverage in addition to their HDHP
generally cannot contribute to an HSA. However, individuals now aren't
disqualified if they hold a separate policy or rider that covers
prescription drugs. This "transition relief" period comes to an
end on Dec. 31, 2005. Pharmacy discount cards, however, won't disqualify HSA
eligibility, Bachman said. A card, for example, might entitle an employee to
receive discounts of 15% to 50% on prescriptions. As long as the principal
health coverage is provided by the HDHP, an eligible individual also can
carry "permitted insurance," which includes disease-specific
coverage (e.g., cancer, diabetes, asthma), he added.
|
 | Comparability rule: Employers
that contribute HSA dollars to their employee's accounts must contribute
either the same dollar amount — or the same percentage of the deductible
— to all employees with an HDHP, Bachman explained. However, if
contributions are made through a cafeteria plan, employees that have family
coverage can receive a larger contribution than can employees who have
single coverage, Hickman said. Similarly, under a cafeteria plan, employers
can provide additional HSA dollars as an incentive to encourage employees to
complete health risk assessments or enroll in wellness programs, for
example, if the contributions are made through a cafeteria plan. However,
Hickman warned, employers could violate the Americans with Disabilities Act
if they require all employees to complete health risk assessments or other
health-related inquiries.
|
 | Accelerated contributions: HSA funds generally are available only after they have been
deposited. However, a little-known provision in the July HSA guidance allows
an employer to accelerate contributions to an employee's HSA if that
contribution is made through a cafeteria plan. Under the provision, the
employer can advance HSA amounts up to the employee's annual salary
reduction amount as long as such advances are available to other employees
as well. The employee also has to repay the employer. "It's a very
helpful provision because the employer can put money into [one employee's
HSA] without having to put it in for everyone."
|